Trust in the Leader of Collaborative Process Design and Facilitation
SKILL SK-25 | Negotiation & Mediation
Emotional Regulation
The ability to manage one own emotional responses in high-tension or adversarial situations in ways that maintain constructive engagement rather than escalating or withdrawing.
How to Develop It
1. Trigger mapping
Identify three to five situations or behaviors that reliably trigger a strong emotional response in you. For each, design a specific regulation response: what will you do in the moment to pause and respond rather than react? Practice each response until it is fluent.
2. Regulation under pressure role-play
Simulate a high-tension engagement where a participant becomes angry. Practice three techniques: the five-second pause before responding, the acknowledgement (I hear that this is very difficult), and the redirect (I want to address your concern - can you help me understand what you need).
3. Debrief practice
After any emotionally demanding engagement, conduct a 15-minute personal or peer debrief: what triggered strong feelings, how did I respond, what was the impact, what would I do differently. Build this into your routine, not only after critical incidents.
Why This Skill Matters
Practitioners who manage conflict, deliver bad news, or respond to community anger are exposed to significant emotional demand. Without regulation skills, practitioners respond reactively - escalating, withdrawing, or over-accommodating to relieve discomfort. Any of these damages the process.
Observable Behaviors
+ Recognizes their own emotional triggers in conflict and engagement contexts
+ Uses pause and grounding techniques before responding in high-tension moments
+ Maintains consistent tone even under verbal attack or expressed anger
+ Names emotions constructively when appropriate without dismissing or amplifying them
+ Seeks support and debrief after emotionally demanding engagements, not only after incidents
Self-Assessment
Read each Reflective Question below and honestly consider how consistently you demonstrate this in your actual fieldwork, not how you think you should behave, but how you do behave. Then assign a score from 1 (lowest) to 4 (highest):
(1) Not yet developed: Rarely demonstrated in practice
(2) Emerging: Demonstrated sometimes, but inconsistently or only under favorable conditions
(3) Established: Demonstrated reliably in most situations, including moderately challenging ones
(4) Adaptive: Demonstrated reliably even in high-pressure situations, and practitioner actively helps
Common Gaps & Pitfalls
! Treating emotional regulation as a wellness issue rather than a professional skill with operational impact
! Relying on suppression rather than regulation - pushing emotions down rather than processing them
! Not building recovery time into engagement schedules - emotional depletion accumulates
Reflective Questions Score from 1 (lowest) to 4 (highest):
I can name my primary emotional triggers in conflict and engagement contexts
I use specific regulation techniques in high-tension moments rather than reacting instinctively
I maintain consistent tone and presence under verbal pressure
I seek support and debrief after emotionally demanding engagements
Th shared to the public for free courtesy of the
THE CONFLICT RESOLUTION GROUP FOUNDATION
www.coregroup.org.ph * info@coregroup.org.ph
in partnership with SustainABILITIES Lab
© Pixelhaze 2024. A Hostinger Website Builder Template by Pixelhaze Studio
This toolkit is provided for general guidance and informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal, technical, or professional advice. While efforts have been made to ensure accuracy and relevance, users are encouraged to exercise their own judgment and consult appropriate experts when necessary. The developers of this toolkit assume no liability for any decisions or actions taken based on its use.