Trust in the Leader of Collaborative Process Design and Facilitation
SKILL SK-12 | Facilitation & Safe Expression
Psychologically Safe Space Creation
The ability to design and hold engagement conditions where participants feel genuinely safe to speak honestly - including expressing disagreement, uncertainty, fear, or dissatisfaction - without fear of social, economic, or institutional consequence.
How to Develop It
1. Ground rules co-design
Instead of presenting ground rules, invite participants to co-design them at the start of a session. Ask: what would make it easier for everyone here to speak honestly today? Record and post the rules. This act itself creates safety.
2. Separate-group design
Identify an upcoming engagement with parties who hold different power positions. Design separate sessions before any joint session. Compare what each group says separately to what emerges in the joint setting. Document differences.
3. Safe space signal audit
After each session, review whether any moment suggested that safety had broken down: sudden silence, withdrawal, deflection, or conditional language. What triggered it? How did you respond? What would you do differently?
Why This Skill Matters
Participation without psychological safety produces performance, not genuine input. When community members attend but do not speak honestly, the project team collects data that reflects what people think is expected or safe to say - not what they actually think.
Observable Behaviors
+ Makes explicit at the start of every engagement that concerns and disagreements are welcome
+ Designs separate engagement spaces for groups with different power positions
+ Maintains the same tone and responsiveness whether a participant agrees or disagrees
+ Follows through visibly when concerns raised in safe space sessions are acted on
+ Notices cues that psychological safety has broken down and responds in the moment
Self-Assessment
Read each Reflective Question below and honestly consider how consistently you demonstrate this in your actual fieldwork, not how you think you should behave, but how you do behave. Then assign a score from 1 (lowest) to 4 (highest):
(1) Not yet developed: Rarely demonstrated in practice
(2) Emerging: Demonstrated sometimes, but inconsistently or only under favorable conditions
(3) Established: Demonstrated reliably in most situations, including moderately challenging ones
(4) Adaptive: Demonstrated reliably even in high-pressure situations, and practitioner actively helps
Common Gaps & Pitfalls
! Assuming that providing a formal channel is sufficient for psychological safety
! Underestimating the extent to which positional authority constrains expression even in open settings
! Conflating psychological safety with comfort - safety means freedom from fear of consequence
Connections
Related Tool
Safe Space Facilitation Protocol
Consent Quality Assessment
Inclusive Engagement Design Guide
Connections
Related Skills
SK-11: Facilitation
SK-06: Trust Building
SK-24: Trauma-Informed Engagement
Reflective Questions Score from 1 (lowest) to 4 (highest):
I explicitly name at the start of engagements that honest concerns and disagreements are welcome
I design separate engagement spaces when significant power differentials exist between groups
I maintain consistent responsiveness whether participants agree or disagree with the project
I can identify behavioral cues that psychological safety has broken down and respond
Th shared to the public for free courtesy of the
THE CONFLICT RESOLUTION GROUP FOUNDATION
www.coregroup.org.ph * info@coregroup.org.ph
in partnership with SustainABILITIES Lab
© Pixelhaze 2024. A Hostinger Website Builder Template by Pixelhaze Studio
This toolkit is provided for general guidance and informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal, technical, or professional advice. While efforts have been made to ensure accuracy and relevance, users are encouraged to exercise their own judgment and consult appropriate experts when necessary. The developers of this toolkit assume no liability for any decisions or actions taken based on its use.